POLICE COURT.
Tuesday, September 3. — Before H. E. Kenny, Esq., R.M. Destitute Persons Belief Ordinance, 1846. — Mr. D. Bishop appeared in compliance with a summons issued upon an information laid by Mr. Snell, the chairman of the Taranaki Relief Board, whioh reoited that John and William Henry, two children of Mary, the wife of the late John Bishop were destitute and nnable to support themselves by their own labour, and that they have a grandfather named Daniel Bishop, of sufficient ability to support them. — Mr. Bishop said he was willing to take the children to his own house, and provide for them. — Mrs. Mary Bishop (being allowed some time for consideration) refused to accept the offer. — The Resident Magistrate reminded Mrs. Bishop that on a previous application for support, she had stated that she could maintain herself if it were not for the ohildreu, and that now how could she expect the Board to relieve her if she did not accept Mr. Bishop's offer ? There was no doubt the children would be well taken care of, and she could see them whenever she liked. It migbfc be unpleasant, bat people must submit to some inconvenience if by so doing they can prevent themselves from being a burden upon the public The resources of the Board were very small, and had to be applied to oases of great neoessity. — Mr. Snell said that Mr. Bishop having offered to provide for the children, nothing more could be expeoted from him, and that therefore he (Mr. Snoll) would ask the Court to allow him to with* draw the information.Taranaki Herald, Volume XX, Issue 2026, 7 September 1872, Page 2
Wednesday, April 6
Charge under the Destitute Persons Belief Ordinance. —Daniel Bishop appeared in obedience to a summons issued upon an information laid by Mr. Snell, the Chairman of the Taranaki Relief Board. The defendant was asked what he had to say why an order (under the provisions of the above Ordinance) should not be made upon him to pay something towards the support of John and William Henry, who are grandsons of defendant and children of Mrs. Mary Bishop, the said children being destitute, and unable to support themselves. The defendant pleaded that he was ' not in a position to pay anything towards the support of the said children. After hearing the evidence given by Mr. Snell and the defendant, the Resident Magistrate ordered the latter to pay into Court, every Saturday, 2s. 6d. towards the support of the children in question —the first payment to be made on the 19th instant. Taranaki Herald, Volume XX, Issue 2035, 9 October 1872, Page 3
D.H'.ieI Bi«liop applied m tlm Couri Loilnterinwio »» oi'dt-r which had been made upon him on theS'iiof October, last year. This was an order, made ccder the above Ordinance, that Mr. Bishop should pny 2s. 6d. weekly towards tbe support ol two of the children of Mary Bishop, the widow of his late son. Mr. Bishop said tlmt he was miable further to continue tliio because a widowed na-ighte*' and her family had lately become dependent neon him for snpporr.. In deference to bis son's <«; I s. r request, be would, however, bo glad to take charge of Mrs. Mary Bishop's eldepfc boy, nnd b r iug liim up as one of It is own family. Notice that the application would be made having been given to the oilier side, and no person appeari'iu to rnise any objection, the Court informed Mr. Bishop that the ordor would be determined, and thut he could therefore discontinue the weekly payment. Taranaki Herald, Volume XXI, Issue 2160, 20 December 1873, Page 3
POLICE COURT.
Thursday, August 29. — Before H. E. Kenny, Esq., H.M.
Information under " The Destitute Peksons Relief Ordinance, 1846." — An information was laid under the above Ordinance by Mr. R. Snell, the Chairman of the Taranaki Relief Board, to the effect that Mary Bishop, widow of the late John Bishop, is destitute and unable to support herself by her own labour, and that she has a father, named William Billing, living at New Plymouth, of sufficient ability to support her. Mr. Billing was called upon to say why an order should not be made upon him for payment towards such support. Mr. Snell stated that Mrs. Bishop applied to the Board sometime since for relief, and, in consequence of that application, she received 2s. Gd. per week for about twelve months, or more. She was then struck off pay, but had made a second application in writing about ton days' since. The application was produced and read.
Mrs. Bishop said that she had two children, one under six and the other under four yours of age. She could maintain herself ii' it were not for the children, but she was not strong, and could not get sufficient needlework to do.
Mr. Billing admitted that his daughter was destitute, but that he could not maintain himself, and therefore could not promise to contribute any regular sum towards her support. He was seventyeight years of age. His sons managed the farm, and had to provide out of the proceeds for the maintenance of their father, mother, and sisters. His sons sometimes brought in firewood and other things to Mrs. Bishop.
Mr. Snell said that he thought if Mr. Billing could afford to spend so much a year as he did in the education of one of his daughters, he ought to be able to contribute towards the support of this one, instead of allowing her to be a burden upon the public.
The Resident Magistrate said he certainly could not interfere with the manner in which Mr. Billing chose to educate his daughter. It was the duty of every parent to provide for his children the best education that by in his power. Ib was clear an order could not be muJe upon Mr. Billing, as it was proved that he was not of sufficient ability to contribute towards Mrs. Bishop's support. Taranaki Herald, Volume XX, Issue 2024, 31 August 1872, Page 3
Thursday, August 29. — Before H. E. Kenny, Esq., H.M.
Information under " The Destitute Peksons Relief Ordinance, 1846." — An information was laid under the above Ordinance by Mr. R. Snell, the Chairman of the Taranaki Relief Board, to the effect that Mary Bishop, widow of the late John Bishop, is destitute and unable to support herself by her own labour, and that she has a father, named William Billing, living at New Plymouth, of sufficient ability to support her. Mr. Billing was called upon to say why an order should not be made upon him for payment towards such support. Mr. Snell stated that Mrs. Bishop applied to the Board sometime since for relief, and, in consequence of that application, she received 2s. Gd. per week for about twelve months, or more. She was then struck off pay, but had made a second application in writing about ton days' since. The application was produced and read.
Mrs. Bishop said that she had two children, one under six and the other under four yours of age. She could maintain herself ii' it were not for the children, but she was not strong, and could not get sufficient needlework to do.
Mr. Billing admitted that his daughter was destitute, but that he could not maintain himself, and therefore could not promise to contribute any regular sum towards her support. He was seventyeight years of age. His sons managed the farm, and had to provide out of the proceeds for the maintenance of their father, mother, and sisters. His sons sometimes brought in firewood and other things to Mrs. Bishop.
Mr. Snell said that he thought if Mr. Billing could afford to spend so much a year as he did in the education of one of his daughters, he ought to be able to contribute towards the support of this one, instead of allowing her to be a burden upon the public.
The Resident Magistrate said he certainly could not interfere with the manner in which Mr. Billing chose to educate his daughter. It was the duty of every parent to provide for his children the best education that by in his power. Ib was clear an order could not be muJe upon Mr. Billing, as it was proved that he was not of sufficient ability to contribute towards Mrs. Bishop's support. Taranaki Herald, Volume XX, Issue 2024, 31 August 1872, Page 3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)